2012/5/31 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Please apologize me, but if #820340 was not a showstopper, so which bug should be a showstopper? I am very disappointed with that, because preupgrade is the official supported way to upgrade Fedora versions> Third bug: after preupgrade finished to download fc17 packages, INeed more information.
> rebooted, but grub did not have a “upgrade system” entry. So the
> computer is not upgradable with preupgrade.
> So now, developers say that they need more people to do beta testing,No, that is not the case. See above. The issues with old kernel sticking
> but my question is: if at least 80% userbase had troubles with grub
> showing old kernels, is it possible that nobody of testers had this
> problem? I really don't think so.
around after upgrade were already known and reported before release.
The #820351 case is fundamentally more or less impossible to solve
entirely, outside of sticking Epochs in the kernel package. So there was
no point holding up the release for that. The #820340 case is specific
to preupgrade and isn't a showstopper, so we didn't hold the release for
that one either. There is an upgrade currently in testing that ought to
fix it.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
