On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Johannes Lips <johannes.lips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well I would like to see tilda maintained in fedora. In this bugreport I > created the patch and asked a provenpackager to apply it, which never > actually happened. I'll take a look. -J > I could of course apply for co-maintainership but I doubt that the > maintainer would answer in a timely manner, like on most of his bugreports. > Johannes > > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Michael Schwendt > <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Fri, 04 May 2012 18:30:58 +0200, PM (Petr) wrote: >> >> > > 21 link with flex libs <-- flex doesn't change often, >> > > though >> > >> > I believe that libfl.a hasn't really changed in Fedora at all. It >> > exports two symbols, totaling something like 10 lines of actual code. >> > Absence of client rebuilds is just not a problem in this case. >> > >> > > tilda-0.9.6-6.fc16.src older than flex-2.5.35-15.fc18.src.rpm >> > > 231 days >> >> Yeah, I figured so much. >> >> Interestingly, "tilda" has failed to rebuild two times in a row according >> to koji status, and its bug status page doesn't look too pretty: >> >> http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/tilda >> >> There's even somebody interested in co-maintaining it, but hasn't got >> a response in over a month: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/781875 >> >> -- >> Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.3.4-3.fc17.x86_64 >> loadavg: 0.12 0.04 0.05 >> -- >> devel mailing list >> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
