I could of course apply for co-maintainership but I doubt that the maintainer would answer in a timely manner, like on most of his bugreports.
Johannes
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 04 May 2012 18:30:58 +0200, PM (Petr) wrote:
> > 21 link with flex libs <-- flex doesn't change often, though
>
> I believe that libfl.a hasn't really changed in Fedora at all. It
> exports two symbols, totaling something like 10 lines of actual code.
> Absence of client rebuilds is just not a problem in this case.
>
> > tilda-0.9.6-6.fc16.src older than flex-2.5.35-15.fc18.src.rpm
> > 231 days
Yeah, I figured so much.
Interestingly, "tilda" has failed to rebuild two times in a row according
to koji status, and its bug status page doesn't look too pretty:
http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/tilda
There's even somebody interested in co-maintaining it, but hasn't got
a response in over a month: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/781875
--
Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.3.4-3.fc17.x86_64
loadavg: 0.12 0.04 0.05
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
