tilda unmaintained? (was: Re: Examining -static package build timestamps in koji)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 04 May 2012 18:30:58 +0200, PM (Petr) wrote:

> >     21 link with flex libs        <-- flex doesn't change often, though
> 
> I believe that libfl.a hasn't really changed in Fedora at all.  It
> exports two symbols, totaling something like 10 lines of actual code.
> Absence of client rebuilds is just not a problem in this case.
> 
> >     tilda-0.9.6-6.fc16.src  older than  flex-2.5.35-15.fc18.src.rpm
> >       231 days

Yeah, I figured so much.

Interestingly, "tilda" has failed to rebuild two times in a row according
to koji status, and its bug status page doesn't look too pretty:

    http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/tilda

There's even somebody interested in co-maintaining it, but hasn't got
a response in over a month: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/781875

-- 
Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.3.4-3.fc17.x86_64
loadavg: 0.12 0.04 0.05
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux