Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26/04/12 09:45, drago01 wrote:
> Well the idea was that a sponsor is a trusted packer so why would he
> "demolish all packages"?
> IMO the bar for being a provenpacker shouldn't be that high. Having
> more manpower (as in people that can fix things globally) should be
> something we want ....
I fully agree!

Yes, we trust our packagers(!), and I'm not aware of any "demolishion"!

To become a proven packager, you have to request becoming one and have
to motivate, why someone should promote you. Looking at fesco protocols
it looks like this barrier is pretty high. There were a few proven
packager requests denied in the past.
-- 
Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
               <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux