On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For a while now I have been working on a proposal for some changes to > both the way we elevate packagers to sponsors and what (to a small > extent) sponsors actually do. Please note that this is not a proposal > for any changes to how people are made members of the packager group in > the first place and does not change the privileges of existing sponsors. > > My proposal is at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tibbs/RevitalizingSponsorshipProposal > > I've run this by FESCo, whose response was favorable, so I'm sending > this to a larger audience. Please let me know what you think. Looks good to me. I was unaware that sponsors are (currently) also provenpackagers. I've considered the idea of becoming a sponsor myself, but when I read the archived tickets where other people smarter than me have been denied, the barrier to entry seemed too high. Previously I've just used the "co-maintain to proxy sponsor" route, which isn't super optimal. Could you expand a bit on what you consider "high-quality, non-trivial package reviews" ? - Ken -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
