On 26/04/12 00:21, Ken Dreyer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> My proposal is at >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tibbs/RevitalizingSponsorshipProposal >> >> I've run this by FESCo, whose response was favorable, so I'm sending >> this to a larger audience. Please let me know what you think. > > Looks good to me. I was unaware that sponsors are (currently) also > provenpackagers. I've considered the idea of becoming a sponsor Yes, this is a good step ahead. I never understood, why sponsoring is mightier (in the view of doing harm) than proven packager. A sponsor can elevate packagers and approve packages, a proven packager could demolish all packages. I thought of applying myself for sponsor, but can not substantiate, why I should get proven packager rights. Helping out review process for new packagers results in finding a potential sponsor. This is some kind of suboptimal for helping people. (To be clear, this never made a problem for me, but slows down the process.) -- Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
