Am 25.04.2012 18:03, schrieb Josef Bacik: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:34:07PM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote: >>> On 25/04/12 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>>> +1. I'd like to see this fixed before final. >>> Yes, me too. Afaik, SuSE supports btrfs even for their enterprise distro. >> >> For added laughs, SLES does not support read-write ext4. Ext4 read-only support >> is provided for migrating to btrfs. >> > > That's because Btrfs is way more stable than ext4, oh no, please do not make such jokes as long there exists even no fsck and as long there are zero production worksloads generic tests are useless and what about workloads like virtual machines where AFAIK BTRFS is still completly unuseable BTRFS has many nice things and will be in the future a good FS but call it "more stable than ext4" while ext4 is since years useable for production is a past-1st-april joke
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
