On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Chris <xchris89x@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2012/4/25 Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 12:03 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:34:07PM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 25/04/12 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote:
+1. I'd like to see this fixed before final.
Yes, me too. Afaik, SuSE supports btrfs even for their enterprise distro.
For added laughs, SLES does not support read-write ext4. Ext4 read-only support
is provided for migrating to btrfs.
That's because Btrfs is way more stable than ext4,
[citation needed]
https://twitter.com/#!/josefbacik/status/195190540529184768
Is this a joke? Btrfs more stable than ext4??? Not really???
According to the stab-o-matic stability testing framework[1] btrfs
scores a 63 whereas ext4 scores a 37, so yes, I'm completely serious,
Josef
[1] credit goes to Sandeen for that one.
Josef,
I'm a little confused here too. Can you explain to me the testing
infrastructure involved with stab-o-matic?
thanks,
-sv
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
