On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Am 25.04.2012 18:03, schrieb Josef Bacik: >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:34:07PM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote: >>>> On 25/04/12 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>>>> +1. I'd like to see this fixed before final. >>>> Yes, me too. Afaik, SuSE supports btrfs even for their enterprise distro. >>> >>> For added laughs, SLES does not support read-write ext4. Ext4 read-only support >>> is provided for migrating to btrfs. >>> >> >> That's because Btrfs is way more stable than ext4, > > oh no, please do not make such jokes > > as long there exists even no fsck and as long there are > zero production worksloads generic tests are useless > > and what about workloads like virtual machines where AFAIK > BTRFS is still completly unuseable > > BTRFS has many nice things and will be in the future a good > FS but call it "more stable than ext4" while ext4 is since > years useable for production is a past-1st-april joke > Wow ok I would have thought after the stab-o-matic thing it would have been obvious I was kidding, Btrfs still has a little ways to go before it is as stable as Ext4, though we are getting closer. Thanks, Josef -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
