Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Brendan Conoboy <blc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04/03/2012 12:02 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> Erm... you already have this.  So will any SA making a transition.  I
>> don't see a problem.
>
>
> Outside PHX, yes.  Inside, no.

If an SA wants to go off and do a staging hub instead of just planning
on shipping their hub they've built with from inception to PHX that's
fine.  It seeems like a waste of time to purchase/create a new hub
instance that will basically be thrown away once it migrates to a PA
but if the SA team wants to do that then I doubt anyone will complain.

josh
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux