Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Brendan Conoboy <blc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04/03/2012 04:58 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 2, 2012 11:10 PM, "Brendan Conoboy" <blc@xxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:blc@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>>  > All builds must occur on Fedora-maintained build servers.
>>  >
>>  > FYI, this will require an additional koji-hub for each architecture
>> trying to move to PA.  Generally agree, though.
>>
>> No.  The additional hub is only needed while an arch is secondary.
>> Once it is PA it is driven from the single koji hub.
>
>
> Exactly.  And if there were two unrelated arches in transition it would mean
> 2 hubs would be needed.  The point here is that a piece of hardware is
> needed so SA's making the transition will need to ensure this hardware is
> available.

Erm... you already have this.  So will any SA making a transition.  I
don't see a problem.

josh
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux