Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/21/2012 09:21 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> Except when people are forced to look at it, their solution was often
>> ExcludeArch for PPC.  As I said in the other thread, you cannot force
>> people to care about an architecture they don't know or want to learn.
>
>
> That suggests we need a FTBFS-like nightly test that lets us know about new,
> unexpected ExcludeArches in the distro.

Possibly.  There are ExcludeArch trackers that people are supposed to make
their bugs block and that was normally sufficient to give the arch team a
heads up.  However, I'm sure there were packages that didn't have bugs filed
like that.

josh
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux