Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy.

Why not?

For example, I use a commercial backup program that makes extensive use
of IPC and needs the msgmni and msgmnb limits raised beyond the default
values.  Why shouldn't they be able to include that change in their RPM?

If not, what's the point of /etc/sysctl.d?
-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux