On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > > No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy. > > Why not? > > For example, I use a commercial backup program that makes extensive use > of IPC and needs the msgmni and msgmnb limits raised beyond the default > values. Why shouldn't they be able to include that change in their RPM? What happens if two packages want to set a sysctl to different values ? Dave -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
