On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Peter Robinson (pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx) said: >> > At least for aircrack-ng from your list no FTBFS bug has been filed, >> > therefore I do not see any reason to remove it from Fedora. And in case >> > it really does not build, I expect a bug report. >> >> There hasn't been FTBFS bug reports since Matt stopped doing them due >> to lack of time, the maintainer would have got failed builds for the >> mass rebuild and should have investigated as part of "maintaining" the >> package. > > If there aren't FTBFS bug reports in the future, that's going to make > doing FTBFS-blocking tricky. Did you generate your list merely from > "things with older dist tags, so they obviously didn't rebuild", or from > some more canonical source? Things with older dist tags that I then cross checked because they were also not building on ARM. Most of them were ftbfs in both the F-15 and F-17 mass rebuilds, some even in the F-12 mass rebuild! Matt stepped down from his ftbfs some time ago and I've never seen anything done about it since. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
