Peter Robinson (pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > At least for aircrack-ng from your list no FTBFS bug has been filed, > > therefore I do not see any reason to remove it from Fedora. And in case > > it really does not build, I expect a bug report. > > There hasn't been FTBFS bug reports since Matt stopped doing them due > to lack of time, the maintainer would have got failed builds for the > mass rebuild and should have investigated as part of "maintaining" the > package. If there aren't FTBFS bug reports in the future, that's going to make doing FTBFS-blocking tricky. Did you generate your list merely from "things with older dist tags, so they obviously didn't rebuild", or from some more canonical source? Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
