W dniu 07.03.2012 10:13, Xavier Bachelot pisze: > On 03/06/2012 11:49 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: >> W dniu 11.12.2011 13:01, Xavier Bachelot pisze: >>> Hi, >>> >>> libbluray has made its first official release a few days ago. The soname >>> was bumped to 1.0.0 just before the release, in order to make sure it's >>> incompatible with older snapshots they have produced. The snapshots I've >>> made and packaged for Fedora are compatible with the release, so >>> Fedora/RPM Fusion packages should be fine after a simple rebuild. >>> >>> I would like to have a clean start with this library and have the >>> updated package pushed to devel, but also to all currently active >>> releases ( F-16, F-15 and EL-6), despite the soname breakage. Now that >>> upstream is ready to push releases, I think it will be easier to keep >>> the package in good shape if we follow them. >>> >>> Affected packages are as follow : >>> >>> For F17 and F16 : >>> gvfs (fedora) >>> mplayer (rpmfusion-free) >>> xbmc (rpmfusion-free) >>> >>> For F15 : >>> mplayer (rpmfusion-free) >>> xbmc (rpmfusion-free) >>> >>> EL-6 doesn't have any affected package. >>> >>> Please let me know if you're ok with that, and I'll proceed with the >>> builds and the build overrides request. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Xavier >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> So what happened with pushing libbluray to older Fedora branches? I am >> fine with rebuilding mplayer, do other apps rebuild cleanly? >> > > gvfs was rebuilding fine against either the older or the newer API and > the maintainer was ok to rebuild. > > xbmc 10.1 needed some patches. They were applied. They are not needed > for xbmc 11, so depending on the version in F16 and F15, they might > still need to be applied. The maintainer was ok with rebuilding too. See > http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2011-December/011019.html > > > mplayer needed a patch too, but it wasn't applied. The patch might not > be needed anymore as mplayer has been updated to a more recent snapshot. > See > http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2011-December/011017.html > > > The whole discussion is in rpmfusion-devel archives : > http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2011-December/010981.html > > > The vlc maintainer was looking at pushing vlc 2.0 to F16 and maybe F15 > too. This release can use libbluray. > > For completeness, xine-lib 1.2 and xine-lib 1.1.21 can also use > libbluray. 1.1.21 is not released yet and I'm not sure what the state of > xine-lib in Fedora/RPM Fusion is at the moment anyway. An update to 1.2 > for F17 was discussed, but this version cannot be easily split into a > patent-free and a patent-encumbered package, so that will need to be in > RPM Fusion and it will drag a couple other packages too. > > Regards, > Xavier OK, so basically everything which depends on libbluray *currently* can be patched and rebuilt. Shall we do the update then? I can take care of applying the patch to mplayer since I am its new co-maintainer. Julian -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
