Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:16:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
> 
> On 03/02/2012 11:52 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > So I would make a contra-proposal.
> >
> > If a maintainer doesn't respond to a bug repord with the status new
> > in a week - give commit rights to the reporter in pkgdb so he/she
> > can fix it himself.
> >
> > I really think this is way more fare and people that tend to think
> > that packagers are just a bunch of lazy guys should step in do
> > some of this dirty work to get an idea what we speak about.
> 
> There currently is no place in the project for people that want to
> fix
> things without having to maintain packages themselves so I think your
> counter proposal as good as it is can not come to pass until that has
> been fixed.

Well, Fedora ships packages. I might be stupid but would someone please explain me how can one deliver fixed/improved packages to users without do at least a bit of packaging work. I don't see a way this to happen.

Alex

> 
> JBG
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux