On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thomas Spura wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users >> >> Why? >> We already do that on fedora so nothing will change. >> (Right now we have a symlink from python2 -> python and not the other >> way around like in the pep, but the result for a user is the same.) > Thanks, I hadn't noticed we already have implemented python2 symlink. Good :) I just had the feeling you mean Fedora is a "bleeding edge disto" ;) -Tom -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
