Thomas Spura wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users > > Why? > We already do that on fedora so nothing will change. > (Right now we have a symlink from python2 -> python and not the other > way around like in the pep, but the result for a user is the same.) > > Greetings, > Tom Thanks, I hadn't noticed we already have implemented python2 symlink. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
