Re: /usrmove and path ordering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 15.02.2012 14:25, schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
>> I haven't seen this work and I don't think such snaphots can be relied
>> upon: /boot, /etc and /var are affected by installs as well

Miroslav -- you haven't seen this work because the tasks are not all
yet in. But the "stateless" feature handles a lot of it already.

> this is a additional reason why the /usrmove is completly

Harald, it is one step in a process. I am very happy and thankful that
Fedora is working in this direction.

Now, it's time for me to step aside from this thread.


m
-- 
 martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx
 martin@xxxxxxxxxx -- Software Architect - OLPC
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux