Re: /usrmove and path ordering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Martin Langhoff
<martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You are wrong. The /usr move has a very clear impact in being able to
> snapshot your OS install partition. Add btrfs, yum hooks and the
> already-implemented "stateless" configuration and you have a really major
> feature: a fully upgrade/test/rollback setup for Fedora.

I haven't seen this work and I don't think such snaphots can be relied
upon: /boot, /etc and /var are affected by installs as well
(especially in the cases where you would want to roll back); I don't
think anybody wants exactly the separation provided by the crude /usr
vs. rest that is provided by the /usr move.

And snapshots that can not be relied upon may be even worse than no
snapshots if they motivate users to skip creating proper backups.
    Mirek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux