Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb 3, 2012, at 12:06 PM, John Reiser wrote:

> Examining with gparted and Disk Utility, I see an Apple partition label
> that designates partitions:
> 
>  HFS (not plus)       1 MB  boot
>  HFS+ journalled   25.6 GB  Machintosh HD
>  ext3              10.6 GB  Fedora root
>  swap               1.0 GB
> 
> I believe that the plain HFS boot partition was created during
> Fedora install.  It's now running MacOS 10.4.11 and Fedora 12,
> which are both the latest applicable releases.

I though you meant a user accessible volume being formatted as HFS. 

HFS+ and HFSX volumes must be greater than 32MB, where as HFS supports smaller sizes. As for the purpose of the 1MB HFS volume, it may be a Fedora PPC convention. I have a PowerPC machine dual booting two versions of Mac OS X, and the disk does not have an HFS volume on it. They are jhfs+.


Chris Murphy
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux