Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 11:06:56AM -0800, John Reiser wrote:

> PowerPC Macintosh hardware will run for some more years.
> The monetary cost for a used machine (1GB RAM, >1GHz CPU)
> is nearly zero.  A "dead" Apple OS has the benefit of no new bugs.
> Preventing the install of Fedora on such a box (if creating a
> plain HFS is required for dual boot) seems to be a harsh penalty.

Since we've already established that mkofboot doesn't use the 
hfsplus-tools version of mkfs, that's not a concern.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux