On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Matthew Garrett wrote: >> The answer still resulted in a spec that permitted compliant >> implementations to have no practical interoperability. > > You keep repeating that, yet I still don't see ANYTHING backing that > assertion. Interoperability depends only on the protocol (which is clearly > specified), not on the visualization (which is not). > >> You can't force people to adopt a spec if they think it's a bad spec. > > Not always true. See e.g. Samba. Sorry but that's nonsense. Nobody was *forced* to implement samba. By whom? You might dislike samba (or the protocols it implements) but that does not mean that people where forced to implement it, they just did see value in doing so so they did it. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
