Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Because it is the job of people who are proposing a spec to answer the
> objections of the people who perform critical analysis of the spec

They did answer. You just didn't like their answer.

It's the GNOME developers who stopped replying. The KDE developers were 
willing to clarify their spec, but not to make incompatible changes with no 
practical benefits (such as renaming Movie to Animation in an identifier) 
nor to specify rendering (which is a non-goal of the spec), up to the most 
minute detail even (e.g. the position of the overlay on an icon), as the 
GNOME developers demanded (not "requested", or they wouldn't have run away 
when the KDE developers explained why they cannot make those changes).

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux