Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The answer still resulted in a spec that permitted compliant
> implementations to have no practical interoperability.

You keep repeating that, yet I still don't see ANYTHING backing that 
assertion. Interoperability depends only on the protocol (which is clearly 
specified), not on the visualization (which is not).

> You can't force people to adopt a spec if they think it's a bad spec.

Not always true. See e.g. Samba.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux