Matthew Garrett wrote: > The answer still resulted in a spec that permitted compliant > implementations to have no practical interoperability. You keep repeating that, yet I still don't see ANYTHING backing that assertion. Interoperability depends only on the protocol (which is clearly specified), not on the visualization (which is not). > You can't force people to adopt a spec if they think it's a bad spec. Not always true. See e.g. Samba. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel