I've started talking to Greg KH, the guy who implemented openSUSE Tumbleweed. Here is what he said: > 1 - What were the changes in the infrastructure necessary for the operation of > openSUSE Tumbleweed? None. > 2 - The Tumbleweed has led to a great "cost" in manpower to be maintained? Nope, it's trivial to maintain (5-10 minutes ever few days at most), thanks to our wonderful infrastructure (the open build system). > 3 - The return of a rolling release repository has been the expected? What do you mean by "return"? Lots and lots of people use it and rely in it every day, and are very happy with it, so it is succeeding as far as I can tell. Is that what you mean? Note, if you infrastructure can't handle such a thing as a rolling release like obs can support, then it will be difficult for you to do this in Fedora. best of luck, ----------------- So, is anyone here familiar to openSUSE Build System? Can Koji do the same? 2012/1/29 Noah Hall <noah.hall@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> Am 29.01.2012 23:57, schrieb Noah Hall: >>> Fuduntu is not the best. Neither is Fedora. I, myself, am a Rawhide >>> user. I'd love for Fedora become rolling simply because messing around >>> with preupgrade and reinstalling is oh so tedious and a waste of my >>> time. >> >> why are you doing it instead a yum-upgrade? >> i made some hundret the last yaers so there is no need for reinstall >> >> Why do you think more people are using Ubuntu for development? >> >> *lol* who told you this? >> >> maybe more people using ubuntu in suammy but surely not for development >> why more people are using ubuntu is clear - many people believe they >> can use it like windows with no thoughts at all > > Personal experience in both industry and education. You can "lol" all > you want, it doesn't change it's the most used distro. I dislike it > strongly myself, and I'd prefer Fedora to be used as it doesn't have a > very silly lead developer. > >> Whatever their reasons might be, Ubuntu being a rolling release distro >> is not one of them. Simply because Ubuntu does not do rolling >> releases ;-) > > Indeed, but there's a lot less fuss upgrading Ubuntu from one version > to another. A lot less. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
