On 01/25/2012 10:01 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Bryan Quigley <gquigs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It's pretty simple, really. Basically, if we don't keep the kernel on at > least a somewhat recent release the amount of work required to support > that release grows beyond what we can realistically maintain. > ... > > Hopefully that helps explain what we're thinking when we go about doing > what we do. As usual, sorry for being overly verbose. > > josh A great explanation - and a nice summary of why a rolling release makes sense for many of the same reasons .. :-) thanks josh! PS - special thanks to you and the kernel team for doing a great job keeping the kernel up to date and purring nicely ... -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel