Re: The question of rolling release?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I can understand exceptions for Firefox (but you don't want to switch
to the enterprise slow release right?), and Wine, but...

I've read it several times and I don't quite understand the major
kernel version bumps.  3.2.1 just got released to Fedora 16, yet it
started with 3.1.0.

Don't get me wrong, I really like and appreciated the updates to the
latest kernels, I just don't see how it follows the Updates Policy.

Thanks!
Bryan


On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 01/26/2012 06:52 AM, Bryan Quigley wrote:
>> Oh, then I guess I would like to see LibreOffice be a rolling
>> component.  I guess one of the questions is why rolling for these:
>> Linux Kernel
>> Firefox (forced by upstream policies)
>> Wine
>>
>> and not for others?
>
> You answered your own question really
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
>
> Rahul
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux