Re: Packaging guidelines for packaging vala bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 04:55:10PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I agree with Ralf.  Vala files are meaningless except for people who
> > care about vala, so they should go in a subpackage.
> 
> So is gobject-introspection then. Not everybody care about it, or
> systemtap, gdb python macros, valgrind..

That's right, and that's why we have -debuginfo subpackages.

[...]
> > More to the point, presumably if the vala files were included in
> > *-devel, they'd also cause an explicit or implicit dependency on
> > vala-devel, which would mean the vala toolchain being pulled in for
> > many packages, and that's totally unacceptable.
> 
> But we don't care having implict&explicit depedency on a browser or python.

Actually many people do care and worry about this a lot.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux