On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 02:16:19PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 01/17/2012 02:08 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > >Hi > > > >On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Ralf Corsepius<rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>I disagree. Like other "exotic languages", anything related to it should > >>remain "strictly optional". > >Unlike other bindings which are binaries and link or require external > >packages, vapi files are small plain text file that can be used to > >read an API more easily than their C or gobject introspection gir > >counterpars. > > > Irrelevant ... these files are only usable as with a vala toolchain > and thus are just "diskspace pollution" to users who have no use for > vala. I agree with Ralf. Vala files are meaningless except for people who care about vala, so they should go in a subpackage. More to the point, presumably if the vala files were included in *-devel, they'd also cause an explicit or implicit dependency on vala-devel, which would mean the vala toolchain being pulled in for many packages, and that's totally unacceptable. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
