On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 02:21 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > While that makes some sense, it was not my point. My point was that even if > the package has NO maintainer, as long as it works, it's still better than > no package at all! Not true. A package that appears to work, has people using it, but has no one maintaining it is likely to become a package that has exploitable security issues. I'm in favor of retiring unmaintained packages. At worst, it will encourage someone to step up to re-add it if it is actually important. This means a new package review, which is a good thing for dealing with "specrot".
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
