Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for F-17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/17/2012 01:21 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
While that makes some sense, it was not my point. My point was that even if
the package has NO maintainer, as long as it works, it's still better than
no package at all!

I disagree packages without maintainers should not be shipped in the distribution and only waste the projects resources and can hinder feature process completion and of course can lead to users of those unmaintained components to leave the distribution because of bugs they experience aren't getting fixed...

Better an small good distribution than bigger crappy one filled with unmaintained packages. ( quality vs quantity )

JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux