Re: Packaging guidelines for packaging vala bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I agree with Ralf.  Vala files are meaningless except for people who
> care about vala, so they should go in a subpackage.

So is gobject-introspection then. Not everybody care about it, or
systemtap, gdb python macros, valgrind..

Furthermore I disagree that the vapi files are meaningless for people
who don't care about vala.

> More to the point, presumably if the vala files were included in
> *-devel, they'd also cause an explicit or implicit dependency on
> vala-devel, which would mean the vala toolchain being pulled in for
> many packages, and that's totally unacceptable.

But we don't care having implict&explicit depedency on a browser or python.

-- 
Marc-André Lureau
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux