On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 05:01:29 +0100 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/16/2012 03:20 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:28:15 +0100 > > Kevin Kofler<kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Michael Schwendt wrote: > >>> However, with the current features of pkgdb, each member of such a > >>> group would need to "subscribe to" the package in pkgdb. Not just > >>> for "commit" access, but also for someone to monitor bugzilla and > >>> the package-owner mail alias, which is convenient for team-work, > >>> too. > >> > >> That's exactly why we need proper support for group ownership in > >> pkgdb. In particular, a new developer joining a SIG should > >> AUTOMATICALLY get write access to all the packages (co)maintained > >> by that SIG. > > Exactly. > > > How does one determine what SIGS exist? > > How does one determine who is a member of a SIG? > > How does one determine what packages a SIG controls? > All these are the known deficiencies/missing features of Fedora's > infrastructure (esp. the packagedb) - there simply is no concept of > "group ownership". My question is: what should the answers to these questions be? If you could make it work however you thought it would best work how would you answer them? I fear there's not any good answers to them without adding more layers to things and increasing red tape. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
