On 01/16/2012 03:20 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:28:15 +0100
Kevin Kofler<kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
However, with the current features of pkgdb, each member of such a
group would need to "subscribe to" the package in pkgdb. Not just
for "commit" access, but also for someone to monitor bugzilla and
the package-owner mail alias, which is convenient for team-work,
too.
That's exactly why we need proper support for group ownership in
pkgdb. In particular, a new developer joining a SIG should
AUTOMATICALLY get write access to all the packages (co)maintained by
that SIG.
Exactly.
How does one determine what SIGS exist?
How does one determine who is a member of a SIG?
How does one determine what packages a SIG controls?
All these are the known deficiencies/missing features of Fedora's
infrastructure (esp. the packagedb) - there simply is no concept of
"group ownership".
Likely, the simpliest apprach to implement "group ownership" would be
handle this similar to "provenpackager", but with "limited/restricted
privileges".
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
