Re: Losing package maintainers (Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for F-17)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:28:15 +0100
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > However, with the current features of pkgdb, each member of such a
> > group would need to "subscribe to" the package in pkgdb. Not just
> > for "commit" access, but also for someone to monitor bugzilla and
> > the package-owner mail alias, which is convenient for team-work,
> > too.
> 
> That's exactly why we need proper support for group ownership in
> pkgdb. In particular, a new developer joining a SIG should
> AUTOMATICALLY get write access to all the packages (co)maintained by
> that SIG.

How does one determine what SIGS exist?
How does one determine who is a member of a SIG?
How does one determine what packages a SIG controls?

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux