Re: orphaning gdk-pixbuf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Fenzi wrote about gdk-pixbuf:
 > It failed the mass rebuild, not much left that depends on it, and
 > nothing I need. ;)
[...]

>  So, if anyone really really really wants to keep it alive, feel free to
>  take it and fix it so it builds and works. ;)


I use gdk-pixbuf in an application that is used on Fedora but for 
licensing reasons can't currently be submitted as a Fedora package.  I'd 
hate to see gdk-pixbuf go away, as I don't know what I could use to 
replace it.  I've never looked at building gdk-pixbuf myself, and have 
never been able to wrap my head around autotools, so if the cause of the 
FTBFS isn't obvious, I doubt that I can fix it quickly.  I'm not going 
to commit to taking maintainership of the package right now, but if 
nobody else does and I find the time to deal with it, perhaps I will in 
the future.

As far as I can tell, gdk-pixbuf hasn't been deprecated upstream; there 
was a new release in August.  Has anyone notified upstream about the FTBFS?

Eric

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux