On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Eric Smith <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote about gdk-pixbuf: > > It failed the mass rebuild, not much left that depends on it, and > > nothing I need. ;) > [...] > >> So, if anyone really really really wants to keep it alive, feel free to >> take it and fix it so it builds and works. ;) > > > I use gdk-pixbuf in an application that is used on Fedora but for > licensing reasons can't currently be submitted as a Fedora package. I'd > hate to see gdk-pixbuf go away, as I don't know what I could use to > replace it. I've never looked at building gdk-pixbuf myself, and have > never been able to wrap my head around autotools, so if the cause of the > FTBFS isn't obvious, I doubt that I can fix it quickly. I'm not going > to commit to taking maintainership of the package right now, but if > nobody else does and I find the time to deal with it, perhaps I will in > the future. > > As far as I can tell, gdk-pixbuf hasn't been deprecated upstream; there > was a new release in August. Has anyone notified upstream about the FTBFS? Are you sure your not referring to gdk-pixbuf2? Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
