Re: What must I do for libquvi in F16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: What must I do for libquvi in F16
From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 23:24:37 +0100
Delivered-to: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Followup-to: gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KNode/4.4.11

Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
> My question is : what must I do ? backport 0.4.x ? downgrade to 0.2.16 ?
> keep 0.2.19 ?

I'd go with backporting 0.4.x.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- What must I do for libquvi in F16
  - From: Nicoleau Fabien

Prev by Date: Re: orphaning gdk-pixbuf
Next by Date: Re: What must I do for libquvi in F16
Previous by thread: Re: What must I do for libquvi in F16
Next by thread: Building and exporting libgbm from the mesa package
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux