Re: A Glorious Vision of Our Shared Update Feedback Future (bodhi, karma, and proventesters, oh my)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/22/2011 10:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The proposal is to treat a PT hitting the panic button even more
> dramatically than a registered user hitting it, the idea being that PTs
> should be somewhat better informed and hence less likely to trigger it
> falsely, and that we have the mechanism to withdraw PT privileges, so if
> a PT does trigger, say, two false alarms, we can simply make them not a
> PT any more. It's much more of a drastic step to revoke someone's FAS
> account.

I think there are equal likely hoods of fas tester to trigger it falsely 
as there are for proven tester.

An panic is an panic in the critical path process and the wheels need to 
be stopped and things need to be looked at regardless of who hit the 
panic button so it make absolutely no sense me that bells ring any 
loader just because some labelled PT pressed the panic button since the 
amount of work required to diagnose this still remains the same...

JBG
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux