On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:24:46 +0100 Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But I remember reports that contained similar information. Therefore > some kind of script must have existed. Maybe it was related to some > FTBFS reports where someone else reported that his script would have > reported certain packages to be unmaintained as well. Ah, I think you are thinking of Seth's 'potentially unmaintained packages' list? I think it checked build status and if the last builds were mass rebuilds or not, if there were FTBFS bugs on them, etc. Yeah, that would be a nice datapoint, but I think more would be needed. Thats the kind of thing I would want a human to look over and sanity check, then ping folks, and only later orphan those packages. I think this was more package oriented than this thread has been talking about. Instead of maintainers who are unable/unavailable/whatever, this tries to detect packages that are unloved. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
