>>>>>> "TH" == Tom Hughes <tom@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > TH> As somebody who is in exactly that situation all I can say is that > TH> if doing informal reviews is an essential prerequisite to getting > TH> sponsored then the wiki could be a lot clearer. Currently it reads > TH> more like it's just one thing that may help. > > It is just one thing that may help. Since we give sponsors significant > choice in who they will or will not sponsor, different sponsors may > choose to look at different things. Most of them will want to see > something that illustrates packaging experience, though. Doing informal > reviews is a good way to do that. > > Which is pretty much what the wiki says, isn't it? And this is how it's worked. For some of my sponsorees I've gone through several rounds of review bugs, others have been more streamlined. It's not about a number, it's about demonstrating that the prospective packager either knows what they're doing or can be taught. If they demonstrate that they won't need a lot of hand-holding, so much the better. ;) -J > - J< > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
