Dne 22.11.2011 17:44, Chris Adams napsal(a): > Once upon a time, Vít Ondruch<vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> said: >> It would be reasonable, on the beginning of each development cycle, to >> publish a list of packages which were not touched by it maintainer in >> previous release. For all these packages, new co-maintainer could >> stepped up and they would be granted the co-maintainers privileges >> automatically. > How is "not touched" automatically a problem that needs new maintainers? > Not every package has rapid development that necessarily needs a package > update within a 6 month period. > I am not saying it is automatically problem, but it might be. Its obvious that package, which is in latest version, probably doesn't need update. However that is not easy to track, as long as the upstream release monitoring is not mandatory. I am not proposing change of owner or anything like this. I am speaking about new co-maintainer. There is nothing wrong about it I believe. Vit -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
