Am 21.11.2011 23:50, schrieb Michael Schwendt: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:58:50 +0100, RH (Reindl) wrote: > >> +1 >> >> nothing is more frustrating for users as ignored bugreports reintroduced from >> release to relase while th eonly response is from bugzapper about EOL of the >> release > > Well, that's not the same problem as this thread is about. > > There a very active packagers (and developers who also do packaging tasks) > who don't respond to [all] tickets due to various reasons. Some of the > reasons are valid. Become a package maintainer yourself, Harald, before > you judge about them all. i do not judge! in my opinion there is no reason to not respond respond can be negative with a short "why" well, this would be much more helpful as bugzapper-mails it is a hughe difference if you give no feedback to anyone who took the time to make a bugreport or ignore it if the respponse is "sorry no time yet" is would be much morehelpful than no response at all > I understand this thread as a comment on improving the detection of > inactive maintainers and unmaintained packages. yes - and bugzapper-messages should be sorted out to find inactive maintainers - i do not say that every ignored report is a inactive maintainer but it is a possible sign we all know that nothing will be perfect now or in future but give users the feeling that they are not ignored is a high value
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
