On Mon, 07.11.11 21:14, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johannbg@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On 11/07/2011 07:41 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 10:35 -0900, Jef Spaleta wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Tomas Mraz<tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Eventual blocking of the packages that violate this Fedora packaging > >>> rule was not yet definitively decided upon, but we agreed that the > >>> Fedora package maintainers should be warned that such blocking might > >>> happen before the Fedora 17 Alpha release. > >> > >> Two questions, > >> > >> 1) Do we have an accurate list of the packages in this category. And > >> more importantly how many of these have closed CLAs in the packaging > >> trees which would prevent me as a good Samaritan from digging in and > >> committing a service file into the rawhide branch. The closed CLA > >> situations are going to be the touchiest, so lets not get blindsided > >> by those in the 11th hour. > > No, we do not have the list. Yet? Please add the question to the ticket: > > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/687 > > Roughly accurate list added from a simple repoquery ( some of which that > I know already have submitted unit files ) and a tracker bug created > 751869. > > Note dont just start blindly working on that list I probably will create > a wikipage on my namespace similar to what I used for F15/F16 so this > can be worked on in somekind of orderly fashion to prevent more then one > person working on converting/packaging the same unit files. > > If you are a proven packager you can start with what was submitted in > F15/F16 as in going through the old tracker bug 713562. > > Unit's created in F17 will be reflecting current state of systemd most > notably we no longer will be using /var/run/, instead we will be using > /run where applicable and we will be dropping After=syslog.target since > it's no longer necessary which afaik will make the submitted unit files > incompatible with F15 ( Lennart feel free to correct me if I wrong > here... ). Yupp, newer versions might want to use /run instead of /var/run, and drop all references to syslog.target. But then again, this is not key, as nothing breaks if they do. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
