On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Tomas Mraz <tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Eventual blocking of the packages that violate this Fedora packaging > rule was not yet definitively decided upon, but we agreed that the > Fedora package maintainers should be warned that such blocking might > happen before the Fedora 17 Alpha release. Two questions, 1) Do we have an accurate list of the packages in this category. And more importantly how many of these have closed CLAs in the packaging trees which would prevent me as a good Samaritan from digging in and committing a service file into the rawhide branch. The closed CLA situations are going to be the touchiest, so lets not get blindsided by those in the 11th hour. 2) And it would be very good if there was a clearly stated mandate from FESCO that gave proven-packagers expressed authority to deal with this on a case by case basis once this becomes a ticking clock situation. -jef -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
