On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 10:35 -0900, Jef Spaleta wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Tomas Mraz <tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Eventual blocking of the packages that violate this Fedora packaging > > rule was not yet definitively decided upon, but we agreed that the > > Fedora package maintainers should be warned that such blocking might > > happen before the Fedora 17 Alpha release. > > > Two questions, > > 1) Do we have an accurate list of the packages in this category. And > more importantly how many of these have closed CLAs in the packaging > trees which would prevent me as a good Samaritan from digging in and > committing a service file into the rawhide branch. The closed CLA > situations are going to be the touchiest, so lets not get blindsided > by those in the 11th hour. No, we do not have the list. Yet? Please add the question to the ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/687 > > 2) And it would be very good if there was a clearly stated mandate > from FESCO that gave proven-packagers expressed authority to deal with > this on a case by case basis once this becomes a ticking clock > situation. I think the proven-packagers had this mandate already during the F16 development and this mandate did not expire in any way. -- Tomas Mraz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
